http://www.rechtanwalt.net The obligation to submit bank statements as part of the granting of unemployment benefits is limited because of data protection, the consortium can therefore require the submission is not unlimited, but for the last three months.
In a now by the Federal Social Court decided the case had the defendant ARGE the granting of unemployment benefit II (ALG II) as a provider of basic hedging for job seekers (according to SGB II) fails because the plaintiff had refused to quota, tenübersicht and submit the bank statements for the last three months. The applicant holds the request of the defendant to be inappropriate and disproportionate because he had been 13 already for months received a high-performer, according to SGB II and indicated in his progress payment application, have in the United-moe-asset and income levels sich keine Änderung ergeben. Bestünden kei­nerlei kon­krete Anhaltspunkte dafür, dass zwischenzeitlich Einnahmen erzielt oder Vermögen angesammelt worden sei, so sei die Forderung nach Vorlage von Konto­auszügen unverhältnismäßig. Zudem werde er hierdurch in seinen Rechten auf Sozialdatenschutz verletzt.
Das BSG hat hierzu entschieden, dass die Beklagte berechtigt war, dem Kläger ab 1. Februar 2006 Alg II wegen fehlender Mitwirkung zu versagen. Eine grundsätzliche Pflicht zur Vorlage der Kontoauszüge, einer Kontenübersicht und der Lohnsteuerkarte folgt aus § 60 I Nr 3 SGB I. Hiernach hat, wer Sozialleistungen beantragt oder erhält, Beweismittel zu bezeichnen and at the request of the appropriate service provider of evidence shall be furnished. The general duty to cooperate in principle be in the area of \u200b\u200bbasic security for jobseekers. The reporting requirements demanded by the defendant were not restricted by § 65 SGB I, showing the limits of the duty to cooperate. In particular, the defendant can not be said, to demand only in the context of a (first) request the submission of bank statements etc. Such a request may also - be in position of a subsequent application - like here. Similarly, the submission shall be limited to specific suspects. With regard to the temporal extent of the submission of statements was certainly the last three months is not unreasonable.
The template is also required by the rules of social data protection principle is not restricted. Both under the special data protection rules in Book II (§ § 50 et seq) and under the general rules of social protection in the § § 67 ff SGB X the collection of protected social data is allowed, if the knowledge to fulfill a task of gathering bodies after Social Code is required. The submission of statements and an account-review is necessary in this sense in order to determine the eligibility of the basic security services and to review. In individual cases, however, be doubtful whether the sur-vey of specific types of personal data for the fulfilling of the basic hedging carrier is required. This includes information about racial or ethnic origin, political-opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade union membership or sex life.
This concerns only the expenditure side (target position) of the account activity. While the revenue measures in each case without limit must be obtained from the bank statements, clear the rules of social data protection (§ 67 paragraph 12 in conjunction with § 67a para 1 of Book X) the basic allowance recipient to one to black on the expenditure side, the recipients of payments, or obscure, if such payments relate to specific personal data (such as contributions to trade unions, political parties, religious groups etc). The funds transferred must-sen but remain recognizable even in these cases for the basic security support. The provisions relating to the Social Protection in § § 67 ff SGB X not engage in the fundamental right of the plaintiff to informational self-determination.
The basic insurance carrier is not in principle, in its partnership proposals to the identified opportunities for blackening of information to creditors hinzuweisen. Im vorliegenden Fall kann aber dahinstehen, ob ein unterlassener Hinweis die Aufforderung bereits rechtswidrig macht, denn der Kläger hat sich von vorneherein und prinzipiell geweigert, überhaupt Kontoauszüge vorzulegen bzw mitzuwirken.
Bundessozialgericht, Urteil vom 19. September 2008 - B 14 AS 45/07 R
http://www.rechtanwalt.net
0 comments:
Post a Comment